The Story of HOHO

 When you enter the game,you have default it must have a definite answer. First of all, thank you for your trust, then please allow me to explain why I do this. 
Who is HOHO?  The first thing to do is to make an analysis based on the experience that we have, and let the experience enter into reason. But is it possible to find HOHO by a universal definition? In the story, I set up three HOHO form, These three forms change over time , Which HOHO can be really called HOHO. Of course, I won't give up trying to define HOHO, otherwise I don't know what to use referred to HOHO, The main purpose of this work is to reflect on how we disprove rules in life,  Two indispensable elements of the game, the positive feedback and negative feedback, it makes us unconsciously move into the rules and focus on getting positive feedback or avoiding negative feedback. However, for rule makers, let other people to participate in the games is their real purpose, Because in this system, who can give a positive feedback, no matter how valuable, It's all within the reach of the rule makers, compared purposes would be worth the cost, by the way, the positive feedback and negative feedback, purpose and cost, these words without any value judgment, do not use value judgment to understand. As the creators of this game, I have the natural authority to make rules, but careful analysis of who is HOHO reveals that the problem itself seems unreliable. In the real practice, we have the opportunity to question the rules themselves, the economic rules, political rules. I don't think it's about building our knowledge on skepticism, because then nothing can be built. There is no denying the fact that the rules mean certainty, and certainty is the human pursuit of the eternal goal, but in empirical world, complexity constantly whips certainty into uncertainty. Certainty and uncertainty also carry no value judgments, and although human inertia may favour certainty, it has nothing to do with good or bad.